United States v. Jose Perez

601 F. App'x 337
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 5, 2015·No. 14-10668·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Colorado Perez appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. Although Colorado Perez claims that his appellate waiver is unenforceable, the record shows that it was knowing and voluntary, because he knew that he had the right to appeal and that he was giving up *338 that right by entering into the plea agreement. See United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir.2005); United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93 (5th Cir.1994); see also United States v. Jacobs, 635 F.3d 778, 781 (5th Cir.2011). Additionally, the waiver, which the government invokes, precludes consideration of Colorado Perez’s claim concerning his sentence. Accordingly, the government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Perez, 601 F. App'x 337 (5th Cir. 2015).

601 F. App'x 337 (United States v. Jose Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bond
414 F.3d 542 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Marcus Jacobs
635 F.3d 778 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Nicholas Arthur Portillo
18 F.3d 290 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)