United States v. Jose Najera-Gandara

438 F. App'x 338
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 2011
Docket10-50991
StatusUnpublished

This text of 438 F. App'x 338 (United States v. Jose Najera-Gandara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Najera-Gandara, 438 F. App'x 338 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Manuel Najera-Gandara (Najera), represented by appointed attorney Alberto M. Ramon, appeals from his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. He contends solely that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

The record is not sufficiently developed to permit direct review of Najera’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See United States v. Bounds, 943 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir.1991). Therefore, Najera’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Attorney Ramon is WARNED that he “ha[s] no duty to bring frivolous appeals; the opposite is true[,]” United States v. Burleson, 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir.1994), and that frivolous appeals in the future may subject counsel to sanctions.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Burleson
22 F.3d 93 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Joe Allen Bounds
943 F.2d 541 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 F. App'x 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-najera-gandara-ca5-2011.