United States v. Jose Luis Rios-Muro

161 F. App'x 626
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 12, 2006
Docket04-3542
StatusUnpublished

This text of 161 F. App'x 626 (United States v. Jose Luis Rios-Muro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Luis Rios-Muro, 161 F. App'x 626 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jose Luis Rios-Muro appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed following his guilty plea to illegally reentering the United States after having been convicted of an aggravated felony (burglary) and deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Rios-Muro argues that the district court should have departed downward based on overstated criminal history and based on cultural assimilation. He also argues that the district court impermissibly double counted the burglary conviction, by using it both to enhance his base offense level and to compute his criminal history.

These arguments fail. First, the district court’s decision not to grant a downward departure based on overstated criminal history is unreviewable. See United States v. Frokjer, 415 F.3d 865, 874 (8th Cir.2005) (denial of downward departure is unreviewable unless district court had unconstitutional motive or erroneously believed it lacked authority to depart). Second, Rios-Muro did not move below for a departure based on cultural assimilation, and the district court did not plainly err in not departing sua sponte. See United States v. Montanye, 996 F.2d 190, 192 (8th Cir.1993) (en banc) (standard of review). Third, the district court did not err in considering Rios-Muro’s burglary conviction in computing both his offense level and his criminal history. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2, comment, (n.6) (“conviction taken into account under ... [U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1) ] is not excluded from consideration of whether that conviction receives criminal history points”); cf. United States v. Dyck, 334 F.3d 736, 740 (8th Cir.2003) (in illegal-reentry ease, defendant’s prior drug-trafficking conviction could be used both to enhance his base offense level pursuant to § 2L1.2(b)(1) and to compute his criminal history category).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Arlene Marie Frokjer
415 F.3d 865 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 F. App'x 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-luis-rios-muro-ca8-2006.