United States v. Jose Luis Quiroz-Reyna

500 F.2d 1223, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 5, 1974
Docket73-2328
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 500 F.2d 1223 (United States v. Jose Luis Quiroz-Reyna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Luis Quiroz-Reyna, 500 F.2d 1223, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789 (9th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

OPINION

Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from a conviction of violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (possession of marijuana with intent to distribute) .

Defendant was stopped on February 26, 1973, at a border patrol checkpoint on Interstate 8, two miles west of O cotil-lo so that agents could check the citizenship of the driver and check the vehicle for aliens. The parties have stipulated that this was a stationary checkpoint rather than a roving patrol. 1 Pursuant to this stop the marijuana was discovered.

Defendant urges that the stop of his vehicle was unconstitutional under the logic of Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973). In United States v. Bowen, 500 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1974), we held that stops at fixed checkpoints are unconstitutional if they do not occur at the functional equivalent of a border. However, as to such stops the rule was made to apply only to stops occurring after June 21, 1973.

We hold that for purposes of retroactivity a stationary checkpoint, even though temporary, is similar to a fixed checkpoint. United States v. Grijalva-Carrera, 500 F.2d 592 (9th Cir. *1224 1974) (en banc). Thus the stop of defendant’s car was, on the date of the stop, legal under the law of this circuit.

Since the border agent was entitled to open the trunk pursuant to his search for aliens under § 287(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U. S.C. § 1357(a), as then in force we need not consider the probable cause issue.

Affirmed.

1

. Three agents with a van or two sedans, aided by a “stop” sign, stopped all traffic and checked the citizenship of the person driving the car.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quiroz-Reyna v. United States
422 U.S. 1057 (Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
500 F.2d 1223, 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 7789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-luis-quiroz-reyna-ca9-1974.