United States v. Jose Luis Garcia

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Jose Luis Garcia

476 F.2d 286, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10692

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 5, 1973

Docket72-3179

StatusPublished

This text of 476 F.2d 286 (United States v. Jose Luis Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jose Luis Garcia, 476 F.2d 286, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10692 (9th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Garcia was convicted of two drug offenses proscribed by 21 U.S.C. § 174. His offenses were committed, and he was indicted, before May 1, 1971, the date when the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, Pub.L. 91-513, 84 Stat. 1236, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., became effective. That Act repealed the provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 7237(d), which had provided for mandatory sentences for offenses such as those committed by Garcia and had further provided that the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 4202, permitting parole, should not be applicable to such cases.

On this appeal, Garcia makes only one contention, i. e., that he was entitled, contrary to the District Court’s interpretation, to the application of the mSre lenient provisions of the 1970 Act. He bases his contention on the fact that his conviction and sentence occurred after the effective date of the Act. Very re *287 cently, a similar contention was rejected by the Supreme Court of the United States. Bradley v. United States, 410 U.S. 605, 93 S.Ct. 1151, 35 L.Ed.2d 528 (1973). Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Garcia was convicted of two drug offenses proscribed by 21 U.S.C. § 174. His offenses were committed, and he was indicted, before May 1, 1971, the date when the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, Pub.L. 91-513, 84 Stat. 1236, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq., became effective. That Act repealed the provisions of 26 U.S.C. § 7237(d), which had provided for mandatory sentences for offenses such as those committed by Garcia and had further provided that the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 4202, permitting parole, should not be applicable to such cases.

On this appeal, Garcia makes only one contention, i. e., that he was entitled, contrary to the District Court’s interpretation, to the application of the mSre lenient provisions of the 1970 Act. He bases his contention on the fact that his conviction and sentence occurred after the effective date of the Act. Very re *287 cently, a similar contention was rejected by the Supreme Court of the United States. Bradley v. United States, 410 U.S. 605, 93 S.Ct. 1151, 35 L.Ed.2d 528 (1973). Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

476 F.2d 286, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-luis-garcia-ca9-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack