United States v. Jose Lara

479 F. App'x 653
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 1, 2012
Docket11-40129
StatusUnpublished

This text of 479 F. App'x 653 (United States v. Jose Lara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Lara, 479 F. App'x 653 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Lara appeals from his guilty-plea conviction of attempting to export more than 500 rounds of ammunition from the United States to Mexico. Lara contends the district court erred in determining his offense subjected him to a higher base-offense level of 26 under Guideline § 2M5.2(a)(l). He asserts the district court read Guideline § 2M5.2(a)(2) too narrowly, and the lower base-offense level of 14 is warranted because: (1) his offense involved only ammunition and not firearms; and (2) the ammunition at issue was designed only for .857 and .38 caliber, non-fully-automatic small arms. He contends his position is supported by the 2011 amended version of Guideline § 2M5.2.

Our court recently rejected materially indistinguishable arguments in United States v. Diaz-Gomez, 680 F.3d 477, 479-82 (5th Cir.2012).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Diaz-Gomez
680 F.3d 477 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 F. App'x 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-lara-ca5-2012.