United States v. Jose Jimenez-Trejo

654 F. App'x 183
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 15, 2016
Docket14-11246
StatusUnpublished

This text of 654 F. App'x 183 (United States v. Jose Jimenez-Trejo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Jimenez-Trejo, 654 F. App'x 183 (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Jimenez-Trejo appealed his sentence for illegal reentry after removal, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contended that a prior Texas conviction for causing bodily injury was not a crime of violence or. an aggravated felony for purposes of increasing his ' sentence. During the pen-dency of this appeal, Jimenez-Trejo was released from custody and deported. He is not under a sentence of supervised release. Consequently, this court cannot afford him any of the relief sought with regard to his sentence, and his appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7-8, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); United States v. Ramon, 320 F.3d 519, 519-20 (5th Cir. 2003).

The appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ramon
320 F.3d 519 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Spencer v. Kemna
523 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 F. App'x 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-jimenez-trejo-ca5-2016.