United States v. Jose Huerta-Cabrera

356 F. App'x 970
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 2009
Docket09-10166
StatusUnpublished

This text of 356 F. App'x 970 (United States v. Jose Huerta-Cabrera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Huerta-Cabrera, 356 F. App'x 970 (9th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Huerta-Cabrera appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Huerta-Cabrera contends that his sentence violated Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it was based on a prior aggravated felony conviction not charged or admitted. Huerta-Cabrera concedes that his argument is foreclosed, see e.g., United States v. Salazar-Lopez, 506 F.3d 748, 751 n. 3 (9th Cir.2007); United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000); and that he raises it to preserve it for potential future review.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Salazar-Lopez
506 F.3d 748 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda
234 F.3d 411 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
356 F. App'x 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-huerta-cabrera-ca9-2009.