United States v. Jose Huerta-Cabrera

356 F. App'x 970
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2009·No. 09-10166·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Huerta-Cabrera appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Huerta-Cabrera contends that his sentence violated Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it was based on a prior aggravated felony conviction not charged or admitted. Huerta-Cabrera concedes that his argument is foreclosed, see e.g., United States v. Salazar-Lopez, 506 F.3d 748, 751 n. 3 (9th Cir.2007); United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000); and that he raises it to preserve it for potential future review.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Huerta-Cabrera, 356 F. App'x 970 (9th Cir. 2009).

356 F. App'x 970 (United States v. Jose Huerta-Cabrera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Salazar-Lopez
506 F.3d 748 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda
234 F.3d 411 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)