United States v. Jose Flores

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jose Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 862 F.3d 486
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 5, 2018·No. 17-10484·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 17-10484 Document: 00514417270 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 17-10484 FILED April 5, 2018 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE FLORES, also known as Gordo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16-CR-284-3

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Flores’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-10484 Document: 00514417270 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2018

No. 17-10484

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jose Flores, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Jose Flores (United States v. Jose Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)