United States v. Jose Cedillo

548 F. App'x 306
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 2013
Docket13-20205
StatusUnpublished

This text of 548 F. App'x 306 (United States v. Jose Cedillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Cedillo, 548 F. App'x 306 (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

*307 Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose De Jesus Cedillo raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2374, 185 L.Ed.2d 1091 (2013). In Morales-Mota, 704 F.3d at 412, this court, relying upon its holding in United States v. Joslin, 487 Fed.Appx. 139, 141-43 (5th Cir.2012), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1847, 185 L.Ed.2d 851 (2013), rejected the argument that the Texas offense of “burglary of a habitation” is outside the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person with a “greater right to possession.” Accordingly, the appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ruben Joslin
487 F. App'x 139 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Francisco Morales-Mota
704 F.3d 410 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 F. App'x 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-cedillo-ca5-2013.