United States v. Jose Campos

8 F. App'x 581
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 2001
Docket00-2291
StatusUnpublished

This text of 8 F. App'x 581 (United States v. Jose Campos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jose Campos, 8 F. App'x 581 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________

No. 00-2291SI ___________

United States of America, * * On Appeal from the United Appellee, * States District Court * for the Southern District v. * of Iowa. * Jose Frodeyl Campos, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: April 24, 2001 Filed: May 7, 2001 ___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Jose Frodeyl Campos pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The District Court1 denied his request for a downward departure on the basis of his cultural assimilation into the United States. Campos was sentenced to eight years imprisonment and three years

1 The Honorable R. E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. supervised release. On appeal, he argues that the Court erroneously concluded that it lacked authority to depart.

We have carefully reviewed the transcript of the sentencing hearing. The District Court’s comments show that it did not believe it lacked authority to grant a cultural- assimilation downward departure; rather, it assumed for the sake of argument that it had authority to grant such a departure, but denied Campos one because of the particular facts and circumstances of his case. Thus, the matter is unreviewable on appeal. See United States v. Edwards, 225 F.3d 991, 992-93 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 834 (2001); United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726, 731-32 (9th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. App'x 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jose-campos-ca8-2001.