United States v. Jorge Pina-Arellano

33 F. App'x 241
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 26, 2002
Docket02-1011
StatusUnpublished

This text of 33 F. App'x 241 (United States v. Jorge Pina-Arellano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jorge Pina-Arellano, 33 F. App'x 241 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jorge Pina-Arellano appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Specifically, Pina contends he was entitled to a downward departure because—as an alien subject to removal—he is subject to a longer and harsher period of incarceration.

As he concedes, this court rejected his argument in United States v. Cardosa-Rodriguez, 241 F.3d 613, 614 (8th Cir.2001) (deportable aliens’ ineligibility for Bureau of Prisons benefits does not provide basis for downward departure in illegal-reentry cases), and only this court en banc may overrule that decision, see Campbell v. Purkett, 957 F.2d 535, 536 (8th Cir.1992) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

1

. The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steve Campbell v. James Purkett George Lombardi
957 F.2d 535 (Eighth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Antonio Cardosa-Rodriguez
241 F.3d 613 (Eighth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F. App'x 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jorge-pina-arellano-ca8-2002.