United States v. Jorge Petter

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 1, 2012
• Docket: 12-6033
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JORGE PETTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00162-RAJ-JEB-1)

Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jorge Petter, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jorge Petter appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for correction of judgment under Fed. R.

Crim. P. 36. Because we conclude that there were no clerical

errors, we affirm. See United States v. Buendia-Rangel, 553

F.3d 378, 379 (5th Cir. 2008) (affirming denial of Rule 36

motion where judgment lacked indicia of mistake or oversight,

but rather reflected deliberate use of terminology employed).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED