United States v. Jorge Martinez

468 F. App'x 423
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 2012
Docket11-40954
StatusUnpublished

This text of 468 F. App'x 423 (United States v. Jorge Martinez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jorge Martinez, 468 F. App'x 423 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jorge Antonio Martinez raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir.2009), which reaffirmed the holding in United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez, 319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir.2003), that knowledge of drug type and quantity is not an element of the offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841. The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez
319 F.3d 695 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Betancourt
586 F.3d 303 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 F. App'x 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jorge-martinez-ca5-2012.