United States v. Jorge Jesus-Casteneda

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jorge Jesus-Casteneda. Read the opinion of the Court — 705 F.3d 1117
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2013·No. 11-10397·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , No. 11-10397 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00322- JAT-2 JORGE DE JESUS-CASTENEDA , Defendant-Appellant. ORDER

Filed March 29, 2013

Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Jane A. Restani, Judge.*

ORDER

Judge Bea has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Wallace and Restani so recommend. The full court has been advised of the petition and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. No subsequent petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed. The opinion for United States v. Jesus-Casteneda, 705 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 2013), filed on January 30, 2013, is amended as follows:

* The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by designation. 2 UNITED STATES V . JESUS-CASTENEDA

On page 1120, eliminate words starting from to immediately before Insert in its place the following sentence:

On page 1120, eliminate words starting from to immediately before . Insert in its place the following sentence:

On page 1121, immediately after , insert the following:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jorge Jesus-Casteneda, (9th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Jorge Jesus-Casteneda (United States v. Jorge Jesus-Casteneda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jorge Jesus-Casteneda
705 F.3d 1117 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)