United States v. Jorge Garcia

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2020·No. 19-41034·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 19-41034 Document: 00515444146 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2020

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED

No. 19-41034 June 8, 2020 Conference Calendar

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JORGE LUIS GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:18-CR-865-1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Luis Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 19-41034 Document: 00515444146 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2020

No. 19-41034

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jorge Garcia, (5th Cir. 2020).

United States v. Jorge Garcia (United States v. Jorge Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)