United States v. Jorge Cortez-Arreola

372 F. App'x 737
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 2010
Docket09-30237
StatusUnpublished

This text of 372 F. App'x 737 (United States v. Jorge Cortez-Arreola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jorge Cortez-Arreola, 372 F. App'x 737 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Luis Cortez-Arreola appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Cortez-Arreola contends that the district court erred at sentencing by failing to grant his request for safety valve relief. The district court did not clearly err by determining that Cortez-Arreola failed to disclose all of the information he had concerning the offense. See United States v. Washman, 128 F.3d 1305, 1307-08 (9th Cir.1997); see also United States v. Miller, 151 F.3d 957, 958 (9th Cir.1998) (stating that a defendant must disclose all the information he has concerning the offense to qualify for safety valve relief). Moreover, and contrary to Cortez-Arreola’s assertion, nothing in the record suggests that the district court misinterpreted or misapplied the safety valve requirements. See Miller, 151 F.3d at 961.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 F. App'x 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jorge-cortez-arreola-ca9-2010.