United States v. Jorge Antonio Rodriguez

848 F.2d 186, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6887, 1988 WL 54161
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 1988
Docket87-7376
StatusUnpublished

This text of 848 F.2d 186 (United States v. Jorge Antonio Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jorge Antonio Rodriguez, 848 F.2d 186, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6887, 1988 WL 54161 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

848 F.2d 186
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jorge Antonio RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-7376.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 26, 1988.
Decided: May 24, 1988.

Jorge Antonio Rodriguez, appellant pro se.

Richard Wilcox Pierce, Assistant United States Attorney (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Jorge Antonio Rodriguez appeals the district court's denial of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). Our review of the record indicates that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez's motion. See United States v. Rosenthal, 673 F.2d 722 (4th Cir.1982). We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process. Rodriguez's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lawrence M. Rosenthal
673 F.2d 722 (Fourth Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 F.2d 186, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 6887, 1988 WL 54161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jorge-antonio-rodriguez-ca4-1988.