United States v. Jordan
This text of United States v. Jordan (United States v. Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 97-2236
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
GEORGE R. JORDAN, JR.,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
[Hon. D. Brock Hornby, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
David Beneman and Levenson, Vickerson & Beneman on brief for
appellant. Jay P. McCloskey, United States Attorney, John S. Gleason III,
Assistant U.S. Attorney, and F. Mark Terison, Assistant U.S. Attorney,
on brief for appellee.
February 10, 1998
Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the record, briefs,
motion for summary affirmance, and objection, we conclude
that the district court properly applied the law of the case
and was not required to reconsider its decision not to group
the mail fraud and money laundering counts under U.S.S.G.
3D1.2. See United States v. Bell, 988 F.2d 247, 250 (1st
Cir. 1993). In the context of this appeal, we perceive no
need for further argument, and we decline to revisit United
States v. Lombardi, 5 F.3d 568, 570-71 (1st Cir. 1993).
Affirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Jordan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jordan-ca1-1998.