United States v. Jong Woo Cha

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jong Woo Cha

437 F. App'x 270

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 6, 2011·No. No. 11-6079·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jong Woo Cha appeals the district court’s order denying Cha’s Motion for Sentence Adjustment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cha, No. 1:06-cr-00482-GBL-1 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 3, 2010 & entered Dec. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jong Woo Cha appeals the district court’s order denying Cha’s Motion for Sentence Adjustment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cha, No. 1:06-cr-00482-GBL-1 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 3, 2010 & entered Dec. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Jong Woo Cha, 437 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

437 F. App'x 270 (United States v. Jong Woo Cha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.