United States v. Jones

113 Ct. Cl. 690, 110 Ct. Cl. 330
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 336 U.S. 641
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 31, 1949·No. S. C. No. 135; S. C. No. 198; C. Cls. No. 45662·Published

Opinion

On writs of certiorari (335 U. S. 883) to review a judgment of the Court of Claims holding that the Court of Claims has jurisdiction in a suit to recover the difference between fair and reasonable compensation for carrying the United States mails and the amount paid by the Government, under the provisions of the Railway Mail Pay Act of July 28, 1916 (39 Stat. 412), in accordance with an order by the Interstate Commerce Commission, on the ground that the claim was one founded upon a law of Congress, and rendering judgment for the plaintiff for increased compensation.

[691]*691Petition for rehearing denied May 31, 1949.

The judgment of the Court of Claims was reversed by the Supreme Cotirt in an opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Rutledge holding:

The Court of Claims has no jurisdiction to review rate orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, either to set them aside or to render a money judgment for additional amounts found due upon determination of an order’s invalidity.
Reversed and remanded to the Court of Claims with instructions to dismiss the petition.
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

[Note. — -The present receiver, Alfred W. Jones, was substituted as respondent in S. C. No. 135 by order of the Supreme Court, 335 U. S. 883.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 113 Ct. Cl. 690, 110 Ct. Cl. 330 (U.S. 1949).

113 Ct. Cl. 690 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.