United States v. Jones

980 F.2d 746, 298 U.S. App. D.C. 369, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33488, 1992 WL 394926
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 1992
DocketNo. 91-3025
StatusPublished

This text of 980 F.2d 746 (United States v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jones, 980 F.2d 746, 298 U.S. App. D.C. 369, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33488, 1992 WL 394926 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion on the question of the sentence imposed upon appellant. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellant’s suggestion is granted. The aforementioned issue will be considered and decided by the court sitting en banc.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the Court filed herein on August 14, 1992, 973 F.2d 928, is vacated insofar as it pertains to appellant’s sentence.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Thomas T. Jones
973 F.2d 928 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
980 F.2d 746, 298 U.S. App. D.C. 369, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33488, 1992 WL 394926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jones-cadc-1992.