United States v. Jones

980 F.2d 746, 298 U.S. App. D.C. 369, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33488, 1992 WL 394926
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 22, 1992·No. No. 91-3025·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s Suggestion For Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion on the question of the sentence imposed upon appellant. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellant’s suggestion is granted. The aforementioned issue will be considered and decided by the court sitting en banc.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the Court filed herein on August 14, 1992, 973 F.2d 928, is vacated insofar as it pertains to appellant’s sentence.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 980 F.2d 746, 298 U.S. App. D.C. 369, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33488, 1992 WL 394926 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

980 F.2d 746 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Thomas T. Jones
973 F.2d 928 (D.C. Circuit, 1992)