United States v. Jones

312 F. App'x 927
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2009·No. No. 08-10164·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

We affirm the district court’s exercise of its discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) to impose a sentence of ninety-six months. The defendant’s extensive and escalating criminal history, as well as the particular aspects of the crime at issue in this case, supports the district court’s conclusion that a sentence greater than that recommended by the now advisory Sentencing Guidelines was required. The defendant’s argument with respect to “double counting” relies on an outmoded and overruled understanding of federal sentencing law that is predicated on pre-Boolcer precedents that do not apply to the instant case. Under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the sentence was reasonable and devoid of procedural error. Accordingly, the sentence is AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 312 F. App'x 927 (9th Cir. 2009).

312 F. App'x 927 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)