United States v. Jones

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Jones

60 F. App'x 650

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 2003

DocketNo. 02-3449

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F. App'x 650 (United States v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Jones, 60 F. App'x 650 (8th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Reginald Jones challenges the district court’s² denial of his postjudgment motion seeking to dismiss his indictment. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that relief is not available at this time under Fed. R. Crim P. 12(b)(2). See United States v. Patton, 309 F.3d 1093 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Reginald Jones challenges the district court’s² denial of his postjudgment motion seeking to dismiss his indictment. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that relief is not available at this time under Fed. R. Crim P. 12(b)(2). See United States v. Patton, 309 F.3d 1093 (8th Cir.2002) (per curiam). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jones-ca8-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack