United States v. Jones

462 F. App'x 438
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 17, 2012·No. No. 11-30429·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Willie Jones, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Jones has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Jones’s response. We [439] concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 462 F. App'x 438 (5th Cir. 2012).

462 F. App'x 438 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related