United States v. Jones
Opinion
Counsel appointed to represent Roy Lee Jones has filed a motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Jones has filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, Jones’s response, and the record discloses no non-frivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Jones’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is DENIED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
218 F. App'x 316 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.