United States v. Jones

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-51211 Clerk Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROY LEE JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-191-ALL --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Roy Lee Jones has filed a

motion to withdraw and brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jones has filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief, Jones’s response, and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Jones’s motion for the appointment of new

counsel is DENIED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.