United States v. Jones

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 F.3d 358
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 30, 1999·No. 98-11511·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-11511 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENNETH JONES, also known as Jap,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:98-CR-082-P-1 --------------------

August 27, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed appellate

counsel for Kenneth Jones, has moved for leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Jones has responded to the motion by filing a brief

wherein he contends that there are nonfrivolous grounds for

appeal. Our independent review of the briefs and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Jones (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)