United States v. Jones

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jones

591 F. App'x 207

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2015·No. No. 14-7459·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vaughnta Markees Jones appeals the district court’s order denying the Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration filed in Jones’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jones, Nos. 0:06-cr-01169-CMC-1; 0:13-cv-01642-CMC, 2014 WL 4629334 (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vaughnta Markees Jones appeals the district court’s order denying the Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration filed in Jones’ 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Jones, Nos. 0:06-cr-01169-CMC-1; 0:13-cv-01642-CMC, 2014 WL 4629334 (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Jones, 591 F. App'x 207 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

591 F. App'x 207 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related