United States v. Jones

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 2010
Docket09-7824
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jones (United States v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jones, (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7824

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONALD WAYNE JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:96-cr-00070-BR-1)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Wayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Donald Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for relief from judgment. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Jones, No. 5:96-cr-00070-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 11, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jones-ca4-2010.