United States v. Jones

154 F. App'x 375
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 F. App'x 973
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2005·No. 05-4423·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin J. Jones appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release on the basis that he committed attempted murder and was a felon in possession of a firearm during his term of supervised release. This court reviews a district court’s revocation of supervised release for abuse of discretion. United States v. Copley, 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir.1992).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. A violation of a condition of supervised release must be proved by a preponderance of the evidence. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(3) (2000); Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 700, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000). A state conviction for the underlying conduct is not required, and the district court’s finding of witness credibility in the revocation hearing is not reviewable. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.1, comment, (n.1) (2002); United States v. Saunders, 886 F.2d 56, 60 (4th Cir.1989).

*376 Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment revoking Jones’s supervised release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Jones, 154 F. App'x 375 (4th Cir. 2005).

154 F. App'x 375 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. United States
529 U.S. 694 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Carlos Saunders
886 F.2d 56 (Fourth Circuit, 1989)
United States v. Sammy Ray Copley
978 F.2d 829 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)