United States v. Jones
403 F. App'x 387
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 15, 2010·No. No. 10-10826·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
Elsie Mae Miller, appointed counsel for Hayes Jones, Jr., filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jones’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jones, 403 F. App'x 387 (11th Cir. 2010).
403 F. App'x 387 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Action Nissan, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America Corporation
M.D. Florida, 2024
Squitieri v. Nocco
M.D. Florida, 2022
Wilkins v. McCallan
M.D. Alabama, 2021
Allen v. Robert F. Deluca, M.D., P.A.
S.D. Florida, 2019
Rodriguez v. Marble Care Int'l, Inc.
863 F. Supp. 2d 1168 (S.D. Florida, 2012)