United States v. Jones
73 M.J. 138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 M.J. 294 →
Opinion
CCA 38028. Review granted on the following issue:
PURSUANT TO THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDING IN RYDER v. UNITED STATES, 515 U.S. 177 (1995), APPELLANT IS ENTITLED TO A HEARING BEFORE A PROPERLY CONSTITUTED PANEL OF THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (AFCCA). WAS PETITIONER DENIED THAT RIGHT WHEN HIS CASE WAS HEARD BY A CIVILIAN JUDGE WHO WAS NOT PROPERLY APPOINTED TO THE AFCCA?
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Jones, 73 M.J. 138 (Ark. 2013).
73 M.J. 138 (United States v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ryder v. United States
515 U.S. 177 (Supreme Court, 1995)