United States v. Jonathan Mauricio Carmona-Bello

538 F. App'x 891
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 2013
Docket13-11440
StatusUnpublished

This text of 538 F. App'x 891 (United States v. Jonathan Mauricio Carmona-Bello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jonathan Mauricio Carmona-Bello, 538 F. App'x 891 (11th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Mauricio Carmona-Bello appeals his 30-month sentence, imposed below the guideline range, after pleading guilty to a single count of illegal re-entry of a deported alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. *892 § 1326(a) and (b)(2). On appeal, he argues that the district court erred in overruling his objection to a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on his prior conviction in North Carolina for felony taking indecent liberties with a child. Carmona-Bello asks us to reconsider our decision in United States v. Ramirez-Garcia, 646 F.3d 778 (11th Cir.2011), where we held that a violation of the North Carolina statute that prohibits taking indecent liberties with a minor constitutes sexual abuse of a minor, and, thus, a crime of violence for the purpose of applying an offense-level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii).

“Under the prior precedent rule, we are bound to follow a prior binding precedent unless or until it is overturned by this court en banc or by the Supreme Court.” United States v. Vega-Castillo, 540 F.3d 1235, 1236 (11th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted). Because our holding in Ramirez-Garcia is directly applicable to Carmona-Bello’s case, and it has not been overturned by this court en banc or by the United States Supreme Court, we conclude that the district court correctly applied the 16-level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ramirez-Garcia
646 F.3d 778 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Vega-Castillo
540 F.3d 1235 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 F. App'x 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jonathan-mauricio-carmona-bello-ca11-2013.