United States v. Jonathan Garduno

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 2024
Docket24-10891
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Jonathan Garduno (United States v. Jonathan Garduno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Jonathan Garduno, (11th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-10891 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 08/27/2024 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-10891 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN GARDUNO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cr-00086-SPC-NPM-1 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-10891 Document: 28-1 Date Filed: 08/27/2024 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10891

Before ROSENBAUM, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1351 (11th Cir. 1993) (sen- tence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd, 975 F.3d 1185, 1191–92 (11th Cir. 2020) (enforcing sentence appeal waiver where district court in- formed defendant at change-of-plea hearing that he was giving up his right to appeal under most circumstances); United States v. Weaver, 275 F.3d 1320, 1333 (11th Cir. 2001) (holding appeal waiver was enforceable when the waiver was referenced during the plea colloquy and the defendant confirmed that she understood the pro- vision and had entered into it freely and voluntarily); United States v. Gonzalez-Mercado, 808 F.2d 796, 800 n.8 (11th Cir. 1987) (recog- nizing the “strong presumption” that “statements made during the [change-of-plea] colloquy are true”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Orlando Jairo Gonzalez-Mercado
808 F.2d 796 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)
United States v. Allandoe C. Boyd
975 F.3d 1185 (Eleventh Circuit, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Jonathan Garduno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jonathan-garduno-ca11-2024.