United States v. Jonathan Anderson
This text of 75 F.4th 984 (United States v. Jonathan Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 19 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50345
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:20-cr-00071-RGK-1 v. Central District of California, Riverside JONATHAN EDWARD CHARLES ANDERSON, AKA Johnathan Anderson, ORDER AKA Johnathan Edward Anderson, AKA Jonathan Charles Anderson, AKA Jonathan Edward Anderson, AKA Jonathan Edward Cha Anderson, AKA Jonathon Edward Anderson, AKA X Rage,
Defendant-Appellant.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 F.4th 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-jonathan-anderson-ca9-2023.