United States v. Johnston

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2005
Docket04-4479
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Johnston (United States v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Johnston, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4479

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY W. JOHNSTON,

Defendant - Appellant,

ANNUITY BOARD OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION; MARSH @ WORKSOLUTIONS; FARMERS NEW WORLD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Parties in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-01-132)

Submitted: February 18, 2005 Decided: March 16, 2005

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. Babb, HOWLE & BABB, L.L.P., Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States Attorney, Christie Newman, Susan Z. Hitt, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey W. Johnston appeals from the district court’s

garnishment disposition order granting the Government’s writs of

continuing garnishment and denying Johnston’s motion to quash

writs, and from the subsequent denial of his motion to reconsider,

alter, and amend the garnishment disposition order. We find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Johnston, No. CR-01-132

(D.S.C. May 3 & June 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Johnston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-johnston-ca4-2005.