United States v. Johnson
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The United States appeals the district court’s grant of Christopher Lee Johnson’s motion to suppress evidence garnered when his probation officer (and five other officers) conducted a search of his residence. We affirm.
When Johnson was placed on probation, he accepted the State of Montana’s required conditions. Those conditions limited his right to be free from intrusions into his residence; they provided for searches of his residence upon reasonable suspicion, and for home visits “as required per policy.” 1 The Government now concedes that the entry into the residence to conduct a search was not upon reasonable suspicion, but it argues that the entry was a home visit. However, the Government did not present evidence to carry its burden of persuasion2 on the question of whether this was a home visit as required per policy.3 Yet that is the only kind of home visit that Montana provides for. The Government’s failure to support its home visit claim is fatal to its position.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
270 F. App'x 637 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.