United States v. Johnson
535 F. App'x 534
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided October 25, 2013·No. No. 03-1322·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
We issued a limited remand in this case to inquire whether the district court would impose the same 360-month sentence on Sedgwick Johnson if it knew the full extent of its discretion. After considering both parties’ positions, the district court has responded that it would reimpose the same sentence. Accordingly, there was no plain error in Johnson’s sentence, see United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir.2005), and the judgment of the district court is Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Johnson, 535 F. App'x 534 (7th Cir. 2013).
535 F. App'x 534 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Johnson
N.D. Illinois, 2020