United States v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 990 F.3d 392
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2023·No. 23-10086·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 23-10086 Document: 00516874855 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10086 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ August 28, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Anthony Tyrone Johnson,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CR-559-1 ______________________________

Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Tyrone Johnson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Johnson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous _____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-10086 Document: 00516874855 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/28/2023

No. 23-10086

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)