United States v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 194 F.3d 657
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2002·No. 01-30708·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30708 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ANDREW CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-10002-3 - - - - - - - - - - April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Andrew Christopher Johnson appeals his sentence for unlawful

use of a communication facility in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 843(b). He argues that his sentence should be vacated because

the $20,000 fine imposed by the district court is excessive.

Johnson did not raise this issue before the district court.

Therefore, we review for plain error. United States v.

Rodriguez, 15 F.3d 408, 414-15 (5th Cir. 1994). We do not find

that plain error has been established. See United States v.

Altamirano, 11 F.3d 52, 53 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v.

Matovsky, 935 F.2d 719, 722-23 (5th Cir. 1991).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-30708 -2-

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rodriguez
15 F.3d 408 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Charlton J. Matovsky
935 F.2d 719 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Michael Ray Altamirano
11 F.3d 52 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)