United States v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 15, 1998
Docket97-40972
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Johnson, (5th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40972 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONNIE LAVETT JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CR-8-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donnie Lavett Johnson appeals his sentence, contending that

the district court erred by increasing his offense level pursuant

to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a dangerous weapon in

connection with a drug-trafficking offense. Johnson contends

that the Government did not establish a sufficient nexus between

the weapon and the drugs to warrant the increase.

Because Johnson failed to raise this issue in the district

court, we review for plain error only. See United States v.

McDowell, 109 F.3d 214, 216 (5th Cir. 1997). The Government

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-40972 -2-

established a sufficient temporal and spatial relationship among

the weapon, the drug-trafficking activity, and Johnson. The

weapon was found in the same general location where the drugs

were found. See United States v. Eastland, 989 F.2d 760, 770

(5th Cir. 1993); see United States v. Caicedo, 103 F.3d 410, 412

(5th Cir. 1997). The district court did not err, plainly or

otherwise. Johnson’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. McDowell
109 F.3d 214 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Ramon Caicedo
103 F.3d 410 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-johnson-ca5-1998.