United States v. Johnson
This text of United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-40972 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DONNIE LAVETT JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CR-8-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998
Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Donnie Lavett Johnson appeals his sentence, contending that
the district court erred by increasing his offense level pursuant
to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a dangerous weapon in
connection with a drug-trafficking offense. Johnson contends
that the Government did not establish a sufficient nexus between
the weapon and the drugs to warrant the increase.
Because Johnson failed to raise this issue in the district
court, we review for plain error only. See United States v.
McDowell, 109 F.3d 214, 216 (5th Cir. 1997). The Government
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-40972 -2-
established a sufficient temporal and spatial relationship among
the weapon, the drug-trafficking activity, and Johnson. The
weapon was found in the same general location where the drugs
were found. See United States v. Eastland, 989 F.2d 760, 770
(5th Cir. 1993); see United States v. Caicedo, 103 F.3d 410, 412
(5th Cir. 1997). The district court did not err, plainly or
otherwise. Johnson’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-johnson-ca5-1998.