United States v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 F.3d 8
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 18, 1997·No. 96-41156·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-41156 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCUS LAMAR JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-33-1 - - - - - - - - - - July 23, 1997 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marcus Lamar Johnson appeals his convictions for conspiracy

and possession with intent to distribute cocaine under 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and 846. The affidavit supporting the search

warrant was not bare bones and the district court did not plainly

err in denying Johnson's motion to suppress. United States v.

Satterwhite, 980 F.2d 317, 320 (5th Cir. 1992). The record was

not devoid of evidence to prove a conspiracy between Johnson and

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 96-41156 - 2 -

Shanta Chunn to violate the narcotics laws and to prove Johnson’s

possession with intent to distribute cocaine. United States v.

Laury, 49 F.3d 145, 151 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 162

(1995).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, (5th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Johnson (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Laury
49 F.3d 145 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Bradford Satterwhite, III
980 F.2d 317 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)