United States v. Johnson
This text of 152 F. 164 (United States v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We concur fully in Judge Platt’s opinion. Incidentally reference may be made to our recent decision in A. L. Causse Co. v. U. S., 151 Fed. 4 (Dec. 4, 1906), where we held that certain cherries were not “preserved in their own juice” when the juices which were retained in them only tended to produce their decay. In the case at bar the preservative qualities are found in the juice itself, the boiling of the pineapple in the juice and the hermetically sealing of the contents in the tin cans.
The decision is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 F. 164, 81 C.C.A. 416, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 4260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-johnson-ca2-1907.