United States v. Johnson

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Johnson

686 F. App'x 823

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 27, 2017·No. No. 16-15644 Non-Argument Calendar·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David L. Roberts, appointed counsel for Ralph Johnson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues offlnerit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Johnson’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David L. Roberts, appointed counsel for Ralph Johnson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues offlnerit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Johnson’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Johnson, 686 F. App'x 823 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

686 F. App'x 823 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related