United States v. Johnson
Opinion
Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Eric Johnson in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
438 F. App'x 804 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.