United States v. Johnson

438 F. App'x 804
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 541 F.3d 1064
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 17, 2011·No. No. 10-15576·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Eric Johnson in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnson, 438 F. App'x 804 (11th Cir. 2011).

438 F. App'x 804 (United States v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)