United States v. Johnny Grayson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 14, 2012
• Docket: 11-7180
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7180

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff ─ Appellee,

v.

JOHNNY GRAYSON,

Defendant ─ Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00046-FPS-JSK-1)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Grayson, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph John Bernard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Johnny Grayson appeals from the district court’s order

denying his “Motion Requesting Home Confinement Due to New

Medical Issues and Relocation [of his supervised release]

Because of Marriage.” We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Grayson,

No. 5:08-cr-00046-FPS-JSK-1 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 23, 2011); see 18

U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3625 (2006); Prows v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons,

981 F.2d 466, 469-70 (10th Cir. 1992); United States v.

Laughlin, 933 F.2d 786, 789-90 (9th Cir. 1991). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED