United States v. Johnathan Crocker

423 F. App'x 431
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2011·No. 09-50857·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Johnathan Crocker has moved for leave to *432 withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229, 233 (5th Cir.2011). Crocker has filed a response and two supplemental responses. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Crocker’s responses. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Crocker’s motions for appointment of counsel and for remand are DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Johnathan Crocker, 423 F. App'x 431 (5th Cir. 2011).

423 F. App'x 431 (United States v. Johnathan Crocker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crocker v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 204 (Supreme Court, 2011)