United States v. John Winer
This text of United States v. John Winer (United States v. John Winer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 22-1869 ___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
John Rick Winer
Defendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern ____________
Submitted: February 6, 2023 Filed: February 9, 2023 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SHEPHERD, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
John Rick Winer scammed investors out of millions of dollars. He asks us to reverse his wire-fraud, money-laundering, and conspiracy convictions, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1349, 1512(c)(2), (k), 1956(a)(1)(B)(i), (h), but his arguments are conclusory and discuss no legal authority. See Cox v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 685 F.3d 663, 674 (8th Cir. 2012) (declining to consider an argument when the party “fail[ed] to provide a meaningful explanation . . . and citation to relevant authority”); see also United States v. Hansen, 791 F.3d 863, 867 (8th Cir. 2015) (explaining that an intent to defraud “can be shown by circumstantial evidence” (quotation marks omitted)). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court.1 ______________________________
1 The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. -2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. John Winer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-winer-ca8-2023.