United States v. John Williams

466 F. App'x 381
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 2012
Docket11-50888
StatusUnpublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 381 (United States v. John Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. John Williams, 466 F. App'x 381 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, John James Williams raises arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Heth, 596 F.3d 255, 258-59 & n. 3 (5th Cir.2010), which held that (1) the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) was a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, and (2) a defendant’s conviction under SORNA does not violate his due process rights despite that (a) the states in which he traveled had not yet implemented SORNA, and (b) he had not received actual notice of SORNA’s registration requirements. See also United States v. Whaley, 577 F.3d 254, 258-62 (5th Cir.2009). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Whaley
577 F.3d 254 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Heth
596 F.3d 255 (Fifth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F. App'x 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-john-williams-ca5-2012.